Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (1)Opposed (3)
Related issue
Rental restriction overlay district amendment→At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 10, 2026.
Public comments (4)
OpposedSally NewtonMar 10, 2026
Opposed the new removal process, saying the existing Section 5.772 already provides a path and the draft could bring unintended consequences and legal costs.
City Council Discussion Only - 10 Mar 2026 · 16:15 →OpposedJill YoungMar 10, 2026
A Shaw States overlay organizer called the proposal a hijacking of the petition process and warned it targets one block face and would invite more exceptions.
City Council Discussion Only - 10 Mar 2026 · 17:33 →OpposedNick TessarisMar 10, 2026
A Bailey neighborhood parent said overlays are vital protections and any exception would snowball into more.
City Council Discussion Only - 10 Mar 2026 · 24:42 →SupportiveJeffrey HankMar 10, 2026
A Division Street homeowner supported the change, saying the current overlay is inflexible and the proposal is narrowly tailored and gives council reasonable authority.
City Council Discussion Only - 10 Mar 2026 · 27:16 →